One Apple exec actually wanted to bring iMessage to Android back in 2013 - Android Police

One Apple exec actually wanted to bring iMessage to Android back in 2013 - Android Police


One Apple exec actually wanted to bring iMessage to Android back in 2013 - Android Police

Posted: 28 Apr 2021 02:42 AM PDT

The legal conflict between Epic Games and Apple has already had some fairly substantial fallout. The court of public opinion pressed Apple and Google to reduce marketplace fees for developers on the App Store and Play Store, and a number of Apple's antics have fallen under the scrutiny of politicians and the general public. The hearing also shined light on iMessage's Apple exclusivity, with the company admitting that it kept the messaging platform from Android in order to create a lock-in effect. But apparently that stance wasn't shared with everyone across the board. It turns out that Apple executive Eddy Cue wanted to bring iMessage to Android in 2013, only to be shut down by peers, as a new deposition shows.

It's no secret that Apple maintains a number of proprietary products and services to keep its users from casually jumping to competing platforms, but few have been quite as successful as iMessage. In preparation for the trial beginning May 3rd, Epic Games filed a brief containing excerpts demonstrating Apple's executive team made an intentional decision to limit iMessage to Apple's own platforms.

The line of questioning in the depositions is aimed at demonstrating Apple's use of platform lock-in to create a monopoly that keeps users reliant on the App Store and In-App Payment system, which came under fire when Epic launched a version of Fortnite that skirted Apple's payment systems.

58. Apple has recognized the power that iMessage has to attract and keep users within its ecosystem.

a. As early as 2013, Apple decided not to develop a version of iMessage for the Android OS. (Cue Dep. 92:22-93:1.)

b. Mr. Cue testified that Apple "could have made a version on Android that worked with iOS" such that there would "have been cross-compatibility with the iOS platform so that users of both platforms would have been able to exchange messages with one another seamlessly". (Cue Dep. 92:5-9; 92:11-16.)

c. However, Craig Federighi, Apple's Senior Vice President of Software Engineering and the executive in charge of iOS, feared that "iMessage on Android would simply serve to remove [an] obstacle to iPhone families giving their kids Android phones". (PX407, at '122.)

d. Phil Schiller, an Apple executive in charge of the App Store, agreed that Apple should not offer iMessage on Android devices. (Cue Dep. 92:18-93:1.)

e. In 2016, when a former Apple employee commented that "the #1 most difficult [reason] to leave the Apple universe app is iMessage . . . iMessage amounts to serious lock-in" to the Apple ecosystem, Mr. Schiller commented that "moving iMessage to Android will hurt us more than help us, this email illustrates why". (PX416, at '610; Cue Dep. 114:14-115:2.)

The statements cite Eddy Cue (SVP of Internet Software and Services) acknowledging Apple was capable of developing a version of iMessage for Android as early as 2013. However, Craig Federighi (SVP of Software Engineering) and Phil Schiller (SVP of Worldwide Marketing) expressed concerns that it would hurt the company if it made software available that removes an obstacle for people that may otherwise want to use Android. An additional comment by another Apple employee emphasizes that iMessage is the biggest factor in keeping people in Apple's ecosystem and refers to it as "serious lock-in."

The Verge adds more details to the conversation, citing the most recent deposition. Cue was a proponent of creating a full-time team working on bringing iMessage to Android in 2013. Following rumors that Google wanted to buy WhatsApp for $1 billion, Cue argued that Apple had to expand its platform to competitors in order to keep Google from dominating the messaging market (a distant fear given how scattershot the company's current chat efforts are). Others, like Craig Federighi, were quick to argue that just having a better platform, like iMessages, wasn't enough to dominate the social media market — he said that Google wanted to buy WhatsApp for that much money precisely because it already had so many users.

The Verge reconstructed the email exchange between Cue and Craig Federighi, highlighting the clashing opinions on the matter:

Cue: We really need to bring iMessage to Android. I have had a couple of people investigating this but we should go full speed and make this an official project.... Do we want to lose one of the most important apps in a mobile environment to Google? They have search, mail, free video, and growing quickly in browsers. We have the best messaging app and we should make it the industry standard. I don't know what ways we can monetize it but it doesn't cost us a lot to run.

Federighi: Do you have any thoughts on how we would make switching to iMessage (from WhatsApp) compelling to masses of Android users who don't have a bunch of iOS friends? iMessage is a nice app/service, but to get users to switch social networks we'd need more than a marginally better app. (This is why Google is willing to pay $1 billion — for the network, not for the app.)...In the absence of a strategy to become the primary messaging service for [the] bulk of cell phone users, I am concerned [that] iMessage on Android would simply serve to remove an obstacle to iPhone families giving their kids Android phones.

Of course, there's no technical limitation preventing Apple from developing iMessage for Android, and most people already assume this has been a strategic decision. Apple has never commented on whether it plans to build a version of iMessage for Android, but with these statements in the open, it's easy to understand why there has been radio silence on the subject. It doesn't look good for public opinion, and it may help Epic Games in making its case about unfair business practices toward developers, but the practice isn't illegal and likely won't draw attention from regulators — which means Apple is likely to stay the course. In other words, don't expect iMessage to officially hit Android anytime soon.

World Wireless Network Security Market Outlook to 2026 - Market Forecast to Register a CAGR of 12% from 2021 to 2026 - GlobeNewswire

Posted: 28 Apr 2021 01:18 AM PDT

Dublin, April 28, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Wireless Network Security Market - Growth, Trends, COVID-19 Impact, and Forecasts (2021 - 2026)" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The wireless network security market is expected to register a CAGR of over 12% over the forecast period from 2021 to 2026. The increasing consumer propensity toward adopting wireless devices in both residential and commercial spaces is augmenting the demand for wireless network security. The growing number of enterprises opting for digital networks and mobile devices is further influencing the market. According to a report from the Wireless Broadband Alliance (WBA), 90% of the survey respondents already plan to roll out Wi-Fi6 and 66% plan to deploy the next generation by the end of 2020. Such developments are expected to influence enterprises to enhance their security as well.

The global adoption of Wi-Fi is on the rise in both commercial and residential space, with a growing number of mobile devices that are connected to high-speed internet is on the rise. According to Cisco, the Wi-Fi hotspots are expected to grow to 628 million public Wi-Fi hotspots by 2023 from 169 million in 2018. The growing adoption of IoT augments growth. With the growth in the number of Wi-Fi hotspots, the number of security risks is increasing, and these enterprises are moving toward adopting robust encryption. WEP uses an old encryption method and holds prominence in old systems, whereas WPA is one of the widely used standards among network devices.

WEP and TKIP protocols have been deemed insecure many years ago as Wi-Fi connections carried out via these protocols can be decrypted with relative ease, and various hardware vendors are increasingly avoiding these protocol usage. Starting with May 2019, Windows 10 showed a warning to its users if they attempt connecting to a Wi-Fi network that uses these protocols. Apart from this, WPA-enabled devices are prone to attacks. For instance, a new bug present on the chips made by Broadcom and Cypress has rendered about one billion devices vulnerable to the attack that can decrypt information in transit, and the bug is called 'Kr00k'. Using the flaw, attackers can exfiltrate information by intercepting and decrypting packets sent over the WPA2 network.

Devices, such as Amazon Echo, Kindle, iPhone, iPad, MacBook, Google Nexus, Samsung Galaxy, Raspberry Pi 3, Xiaomi, and certain Asus and Huawei products, were tested positive for Kr00k vulnerability. Owing to such developments, the demand for wireless security is expected to become vital, especially in network-handling mission-critical workloads. With the increasing deployment of IoT and BYOD trends, the need for wireless network security is expected to be one of the enterprises' priorities. According to a study by Outpost24, 61% of security experts mentioned that BYOD offers a severe threat to their organization, and 21% feared attacks via office-based IoT devices, such as printers. The greatest wireless attack threats were password theft at 62%, followed by Botnet/Malware threats with 60%.

The CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency) which is a part of the Department of Homeland Security warned of COVID-19 network-security issues with the most common including Phishing, Malware distribution, Registration of new domain names containing wording related to coronavirus or COVID-19 and attacks against newly and often rapidly deployed remote-access and teleworking infrastructure. In April 2020, CISA released new guidance on how remote government workers and potentially others should address network security. It included interim Trusted Internet Connections (TIC) 3.0 guidance to aid agencies in securing their network and cloud environments.

Key Topics Covered:

1 INTRODUCTION

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET INSIGHTS
4.1 Market Overview ( Covers the impact of COVID-19)
4.2 Industry Attractiveness - Porter's Five Force Analysis

5 MARKET DYNAMICS
5.1 Market Drivers
5.1.1 Growth of the Wireless Network Traffic
5.1.2 Extensive Cloud Migration, Use of Mobile Platforms, and IoT devices
5.2 Market Restraints
5.2.1 Rising Piracy of the Wireless Network Security Solutions

6 TECHNOLOGY SNAPSHOT

7 MARKET SEGMENTATION
7.1 By Solution
7.2 By Deployment
7.3 By End-user Industry
7.4 Geography

8 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • Aruba Networks (HPE)
  • Juniper Networks, Inc.
  • Fortinet, Inc
  • Motorola Solutions (Zebra Technologies Corporation)
  • Sophos Ltd.
  • Broadcom Inc. (Symantec Corporation)
  • Aerohive Networks, Inc.
  • SonicWALL, Inc.
  • Pwnie Express

9 INVESTMENT ANALYSIS

10 FUTURE OF THE MARKET

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/lijm9g

About ResearchAndMarkets.com
ResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.


Comments

Popular Posts

Signal, WhatsApp and Telegram: All the major security differences between messaging apps - CNET

VPN browser extensions: Why you shouldn't use then - Tech Advisor

Police Target Criminal Users of Sky ECC Cryptophone Service - BankInfoSecurity.com